AstraZeneca Vaccine Is Safe, Europe’s Drug Regulator Says

The European Union’s drug regulator said on Thursday that the AstraZeneca vaccine was safe, a finding that officials hope will alleviate concerns about possible side effects and prompt more than a dozen countries to resume using it against the resurgent coronavirus.

But the regulator, the European Medicines Agency, said a new warning label will be added to the shot so that people in the medical community can be on the lookout for a potential rare complication leading to bleeding in the brain.

Despite reports of a small number of cases of dangerous blood clots in people who had received the vaccine, a review of millions of cases found that it does not increase the overall risk of clots, though “there are still some uncertainties,” said Dr. Sabine Straus, who heads the agency’s risk assessment committee.

Last week and early this week, several European countries suspended use of the AstraZeneca vaccine, a pause that, however brief, threatens lingering consequences both on that continent, which is struggling to contain a new wave of infection, and around the world.

Europe is not inoculating people quickly enough to slow transmission of the virus, the World Health Organization said on Thursday, reporting that new infections had risen for three successive weeks and that more people in the region were dying from the disease than a year ago.

The AstraZeneca vaccine shot, more easily stored than Pfizer and Moderna, and sold for now without the goal of earning a profit, is a keystone of the W. H.O.’s effort to inoculate poor and middle-income countries.

“This is a safe and effective vaccine,” said Emer Cooke, the head of the European regulator.

A fearful public may not be easily reassured.

“I haven’t decided yet whether I am going to get vaccinated or not,” said Giada Pietrolillo, a kindergarten teacher in Calabria, at the southern tip of Italy. “I am not sure I trust anyone any more.”

While the vast majority of the roughly 20 million people in Europe who have received the AstraZeneca shot suffered no serious side effects, Dr. Straus said, there were a handful of troubling cases of cerebral venous thrombosis, blood clots in the brain that lead to hemorrhages, in patients who also had low platelet counts. The evidence, she said, is not conclusive as to whether it is related to the vaccine

The officials said they hoped a clear statement on the safety of the vaccine would calm anxious governments and their populations at a particularly precarious moment in the pandemic.

Manuela Perozzi, a teacher for handicapped pupils at a middle school in Campobasso, in southern Italy, said she was sick with fever and aches for two days after her first dose of the AstraZeneca shot earlier this month, and then grew worried as fears about it spread.

“We can only try to hold on to science,” she said. “But surely I will be even less serene when they call me for the second shot.”

The leaders of the nations, mostly in Europe, that paused its use earlier this week framed their decision as a move intended to reassure the public that all concerns were being treated seriously, adding that they would await guidance from the regulator.Most of the countries had signaled that they were likely to restart using the vaccine once the agency issued clearance.

The Italian government on Thursday welcomed the drug regulator’s findings and said it would end its suspension “as of tomorrow.” Norway’s health authority said it would continue to study the issue before deciding whether to lift its suspension.

Despite their differences, all the vaccines approved by Western regulators have shown themselves to be remarkably effective at reducing severe illness and death. And though the AstraZeneca vaccine accounts for less than 20 percent of the hundreds of millions of doses ordered by the European Union, it was a critical part of early rollout plans.

With infections again on the rise in many European countries, the cost of delay may be measured in lives.

In just one week in January, at the height of the last wave, Europe recorded nearly 40,000 deaths.

This week, more people are on ventilators in hospitals in Poland than at any time in the pandemic, leading officials to reimpose national restrictions, starting on Saturday. Italy has reimposed lockdowns in the hopes of limiting outbreaks. Across the continent, there is rising concern about the spread of variants of the virus.

Hans Kluge, the W.H.O.’s regional director for Europe, told reporters that the continent recorded more than 1.2 million new cases last week and that more than 20,000 people a week were dying of the virus.

In Paris, the head of public hospitals in the capital region said that the situation was increasingly dire and that the authorities were struggling to find enough beds in intensive care units.

President Emmanuel Macron of France said on Wednesday: “We are living through the hardest weeks now. We know it.”

The hope had been that, by this time, vaccinations would allow governments to avoid reimposing the often draconian restrictions that have been a part of life across Europe for the past year.

The suspensions of the AstraZeneca vaccine underscored how even relatively minor disruptions could have outsize impact as the global supply remains exceedingly tight.

“Demand outstrips supply to such a large degree right now, even the slightest hiccup is felt keenly,” said Andrea Taylor, assistant director at Duke University’s Global Health Innovation Center. “There is no slack in the system.”

Both vaccine makers and governments, she said, have repeatedly offered optimistic projections that do not factor in hitches in the production process.

“They seem surprised every time a production problem causes a slowdown in delivery, as though that is a wholly unexpected event.” she said. “It shouldn’t be.”

Few countries in the world find themselves in the enviable position of the United States — which has secured more than enough doses for every person in the country and is sitting on tens of millions of doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine, which has yet to be authorized by the Food and Drug Administration.

Even Britain, which moved quickly to procure vaccines and has been rapidly administering doses to most people over the age of 50, has been forced to shift its strategy in part to deal with dips in supply.

Starting late last year, British regulators chose to allow an increased gap between the two doses of vaccine required for maximum protection: up to 12 weeks, rather than the three or four weeks used in clinical trials.

That has allowed Britain to give initial protection to about 25 million people. But many of those will soon need a second dose, putting pressure on the system and leading officials to warn that distribution in April will move slower.

In Europe, where countries have largely chosen to stick to the tighter dosing strategy, the AstraZeneca vaccine was already a focus of controversy, in part as a consequence of confusing initial trial results, communication blunders by the company and delays in supply.

.

The immediate challenge for leaders across Europe will be to restore faith in the AstraZeneca vaccine.

Concerns about it arose from reports of a small number of people who developed dangerous blood clots or abnormal bleeding after receiving the shot.

Different reports about potential side effects were conflated and a growing number of countries halted use of the shot.

The most concerning came from Norway and Germany, involving cases where blockage develops in veins that drain blood from the brain in patients who also had lowered platelets.

After several cases came to the attention of Paul Ehrlich Institute, the agency in charge of vaccine safety in Germany, the use of the vaccine was halted. A cascade of other European countries quickly followed suit. .

Klaus Cichutek, the head of the institute, said that it had acted after seven cases of cerebral venous thrombosis had occurred four to 16 days after vaccination.

An analysis by the institute suggested that only a single case would normally be expected among the 1.6 million people who received the vaccine in that time window.

The institute said that it had convened a group of experts on Monday and that they had agreed unanimously that a link to the vaccine was not implausible and should be investigated.

In Norway, a group of researchers from Oslo University Hospital said on Thursday that one death and two other cases of severe reactions were probably caused by the vaccine.

“Our theory that this is a powerful immune response which most likely was caused by the vaccine has been found,” said Pål Andre Holme, a chief physician at the hospital. “We have found specific antibodies against blood platelets that can cause these reactions,” he added, which have also been known to result from use of other drugs.

Ms. Cooke said that it was important to closely monitor all side effects.

“We are also launching additional investigations to understand more about these rare cases,” she said. But the regulatory agency found that it the benefits of the vaccine — at a moment when thousands are still dying around the world every day — outweighed the risk.

“If it was me,” Ms. Cooke said. “I would be vaccinated tomorrow.”

Reporting was contributed byNick Cumming-Bruce from Geneva, Gaia Pianigiani from Rome and Henrik Pryser Libell from Oslo.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: